Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revisionPrevious revision
Next revision		Previous revision
gameinfo:setting_design_philosophy [2022/07/09 21:09] – restlessgameinfo:setting_design_philosophy [2022/07/11 18:06] (current) – [What (I hope) we get] restless
Line 1: Line 1:
 ====== Setting design philosophy ====== ====== Setting design philosophy ======
  
-Prepping the setting for gaming can often seem like a cliff you need to climb.  You have a lot choices to make that affect things like engagement, tone, amount of prep required, storylines that make sense in such a setting, how much of an outlet it will be for your creativity and just how much plain //work// it will be to run the setting.+==== What I wanted ====
  
-  * Some people like to use a pre-made setting with a ton of details planned out for everything and tons of canon.  It seems exhausting to me to have to carry the ideas of someone else's world around in my head and be able to pull answers out of my orifices at a moment's notice, so that's out.+Instead of focusing on the setting first, I instead made a list of requirements for a game I wanted to run.  Each, in turn, has consequences for the setting:
  
-  * Others like to take a skeletal setting (like, say, Greyhawk, the "Known World" before it was Mystara or The Midlands) and make it their own.  While I can see the advantages there and you can repaint and rearrange the furniture, you're still hanging your hat in someone else's house.+<WRAP indent> 
 +== Ease of prep ==
  
-  * So, that leaves me with homebrewing a world.  That's probably the most expansive because then you have to do it all.  You have to make all the places, players, connections and history.  I see people online who are doing it, bleeding into hundreds or thousands of pages, worrying about things like weather patterns, plate tectonics and detailed world history of places that the players will likely never visit.+This is highest on my list of requirements.  To be able to do preparation for gaming expeditiously is a necessary or there will be no game at all.  Despite this...
  
-//None// of these are appetizing to me.+== Homebrewed setting ==
  
-However, there's another way.+...I don't want to use a commercially-available setting.  I don't mind liberally borrowing or adapting things, but the cognitive load of keeping the details of someone else's work is often a lot higher than just doing your own.
  
-----+== A light setting ==
  
 +Much of the old pulp literature that OD&D was based on was written with the merest sketch of characters, locations and situations; as they wrote throwaway ideas were incorporated for depth and potential anchors for future growth if the stories become the root of a larger world.  Gaming can be similar.
  
 +== Open table game ==
  
 +[[dict>open_table_game|I want the game to be available and approachable]] by people who want to play, be that every session, when their schedule allows or someone who just wants to try it out.  That means that to facilitate engagement, the base setting needs to be closer to a fantasy //lingua franca// to get people immersed in the game more easily.
  
-{{tag>gameinfo reference}}+== West Marches-style play == 
 + 
 +I want a game that has a [[gameinfo:west_marches|West Marches]] style play.  I want players to be able to do the scheduling and control where they go, plan their own missions and chart their own courses.  I want information sharing.  I want competing playgroups and friendly rivalries.  I want to be able to see the results of multiple groups changing the world. 
 + 
 +== Beer-and-pretzels gaming == 
 + 
 +[[wp>Beer_and_pretzels_game|Finally, I don't want the game to be too serious.]]  No big plot, just some locations, some antagonists with some goals, some situations, and let it evolve.  Gameplay can focus on that, or it can just be about kicking in doors and taking monsters' stuff, it's all good. 
 +</WRAP> 
 + 
 +\\ 
 + 
 +==== What (I hope) we get ==== 
 + 
 +From this I could basically say the setting is designed around these ideas as its touchstones: 
 + 
 +<WRAP indent> 
 +== A sketchy homebrew to riff on and expand == 
 + 
 +A sketchy homebrew world littered with the stubs of ideas can grow as needed and still be rich and engaging.  This thrives on the prepping of locations, not plots. 
 + 
 +== Sandbox drop-in game == 
 + 
 +A sandbox-style game that is set up for such that players can drop-in or come and go as needed will build a larger player base or lend itself to more situations where the game can played.  If players find a plot hook they want to pursue, then they are welcome to drive the direction of the game. 
 + 
 +== Bog-standard “D&D Fantasy,” at least at the surface == 
 + 
 +If you want new and occasional casual players to be oriented, then you need a common frame of reference.  Almost everyone nowadays understands the idea of "D&D fantasy" to some degree, and gives them a familiar place to start, even if the similarity may only be skin deep; at least the //really// fantastic stuff will seem like actual fantasy then! 
 + 
 +== Let's not take it too seriously! == 
 + 
 +It's a game.  Let's have fun and let the game world reveal itself through play itself.  It can be deep or shallow, based on the desires of the players. 
 +</WRAP> 
 + 
 +{{tag>gameinfo table}}

Trace: • Twenty Quick Questions: Rules • taglines • My personal “Appendix N” • tagline

You can’t have “adventure” without ‘U’